Supreme Court Final Argument Schedule for Feb. 3, 2014
The following is the Supreme Court's schedule for
oral arguments on Feb. 3, 2014. The issues before the Supreme Court are
outlined in the Appellate Division opinion in each case. If you are planning to
view the Webcast of Supreme Court arguments, you may want to review the opinion
under appeal in order to have a better understanding of the issues before the
Court. The opinions are in Adobe Acrobat Pdf format.
To view the argument schedule and corresponding opinions for the Feb. 4, 2014 Webcast, click here.
Please note that some of the Appellate Division opinions listed below have not been approved for publication, and that pursuant to New Jersey Court Rule 1:36, no unpublished opinion shall constitute precedent or be binding on any court.
(The following statements of issues on appeal are prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. They have been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity not all issues may have been summarized).
A-32-12 C.A. v. Eric Bentolila, M.D. (071702)
Is the hospital memorandum concerning the circumstances surrounding plaintiff’s birth privileged from disclosure under the confidentiality provisions of the Patient Safety Act, N.J.S.A. 26:2H-12.23 to -12.25?
A-31-12 State v. Cesar A. Lipa (071011)
Did the trial court appropriately apply the standards of State v. Slater, 198 N.J. 145 (2009), in deciding defendant’s pre-sentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea?
A-107-11 Princeton Office Park, LP v. Plymouth Park Tax Services, LLC (069521)
Under New Jersey law, does the purchaser of a municipal tax sale certificate hold a tax lien?
A-30-12 State v. Roger Paul Frye (070975)
May defendant’s two prior convictions for driving while intoxicated be counted to sentence him as a third-time offender for a conviction of refusal to submit to a chemical breath test under N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.4a; and should defendant have been permitted to withdraw his guilty plea to refusal under the circumstances of this case?