Supreme Court Final Argument Schedule for April 17, 2013
The following is the Supreme Court's schedule for
oral arguments on April 17, 2013. The issues before the Supreme Court are
outlined in the Appellate Division opinion in each case. If you are planning to
view the Webcast of Supreme Court arguments, you may want to review the opinion
under appeal in order to have a better understanding of the issues before the
Court. The opinions are in Adobe Acrobat Pdf format.
To view the argument schedule and corresponding opinions for the April 16, 2013 Webcast, click here.
Please note that some of the Appellate Division opinions listed below have not been approved for publication, and that pursuant to New Jersey Court Rule 1:36, no unpublished opinion shall constitute precedent or be binding on any court.
(The following statements of issues on appeal are prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. They have been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity not all issues may have been summarized).
A-124-11 TSI East Brunswick LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of
the Twp. of East Brunswick (070383)
What quality of proofs are required to satisfy the negative criteria for the issuance of a conditional use variance pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(d)(3)?
A-128-11 State v. K.W. (070650)
Does the New Jersey Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-1 to -34, require the suppression of evidence obtained through a consensual intercept of a phone conversation between the minor victim and the defendant because final approval for the intercept was obtained after the call ended?
A-86/87-11 Michael Battaglia v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Was plaintiff engaged in “protected activity” under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) or the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA) such that his employment demotion constituted retaliation entitling plaintiff to damages, or should defendant have been granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial?
D-112-11 In the matter of Amedeo A. Gaglioti